• Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 21,921 other followers

  • Instagram

    Today, the United States spends $218 billion a year growing, processing, transporting, and disposing of food that is never eaten. Fortunately, there are a number of ways to reduce food waste.Click here to read IFT Achievement Awardee Edward Hirschberg’s solution for how we can address food loss due to poor transportation and storage. Link available in bio or copy/paste this link: http://bit.ly/IFTFoodWaste Today, we are celebrating women in science for International Women's Day! The International Women's Day is a global day celebrating the social, economic, cultural and political achievements of women. These particular five women have been at the forefront of some of today’s most complex and controversial scientific issues including genetic engineering and lab-grown meat. In addition to highlighting their work, these interviews explore the influence of gender in food and science. Click link in bio #IWD2017 #internationalwomensday #womeninstem #foodscience http://hubs.ly/H06wKB60 Roughly one third of the food produced in the world for human consumption every year — approximately 1.3 billion tons — gets lost or wasted. Fruits and vegetables have the highest wastage rates of any food. What can we do with spilled, wilted, blemished produce? Click here to read IFT Achievement Awardee Edward Hirschberg’s solution for bringing life back to the "ugly" lettuce. Link available in bio or copy and paste the following to view solution: http://bit.ly/IFTFoodWaste #Repost @hanna_instruments ・・・
The Hanna Texas team had a great time at @iftfoodscience's Lunch & Learn at @nasajohnson on 2/23. Hanna USA proudly sponsored this event featuring a talk by @nasa scientist Dr. Shannon Walker, a tour of the food lab facility, and behind-the-scenes tour of Mission Control! Thank you again to IFT and NASA for an incredible event.

Guiding America to healthier food choices?

A trip to the grocery store can be an overwhelming experience. With tens of thousands of products to choose from, how can a consumer decide which are best? While the Nutrition Facts label points out important nutritional features of each product using a consistent format, many food companies are turning to front-of-the-package (FOP) labeling and grocery chains are implementing at-shelf labeling to quickly and easily help consumers make healthy choices. Each uses different rating systems in an effort to provide a simplified tool for consumers. A new online rating system, GoodGuide.com, rates a variety of brand labels, not only on nutritional content, but adds the dimensions of environmental performance such as energy usage, and social performance such as labor practices. GoodGuide’s database of products is available through its website, by text messaging the product bar code, or through downloading an iPhone application. Thus technology-savvy consumers can have access to each product’s information while shopping.

With all of this information available, will consumers make healthier choices? That remains to be seen. Little research has been conducted on whether FOP or at-shelf labeling will result in consumer diets that are more nutrient-dense or lower in calories. In an effort to increase diets with high nutrient ratings, will consumers consume diets that are lower in nutrients or beneficial food components that are not included in the rating system? With a variety of rating schemes in the marketplace, will consumers become more confused? Will the addition of the environmental and social dimensions simplify the decision-making process, or make it more complex? How will the consumer diet be affected by the presence of the environmental and social dimension? For example, will a consumer choose a product with more calcium, but with a low rating for labor practices?

While rating systems and labeling are designed to increase healthful food choices, they do not take into account three major factors in a consumer food decision: price, taste and convenience. Thus, consumers still need to factor in their own formulas for product choices. While front-of-package and at-shelf labels may be useful, turn the package over—the Nutrition Facts panel and ingredient labels still have a great deal of useful information that can help you find the product that is right for you.

nancycohen1Nancy Cohen, PhD, RD, LDN
Professor and Head, Dept. of Nutrition
Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst

4 Responses

  1. If you want to learn more about using Nutrition Facts on the food label go to http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/label.html or http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/promos/200804_fda/index.html

  2. Dear Nancy,
    I think Nuval is the answer, asuming it eventually gets wide use. I’m sure you’d be aware of it in your position. What are your views on Nuval?

  3. Nuval is one of many nutrient rating systems in place or planned for the near future. It uses an algorithm based on more nutrients than the Goodguide system uses, and is present in certain grocery chains. It will be interesting to see what sorts of dietary changes consumers make as a result of using one or more nutrient rating systems, and whether it will result in overall better dietary practices.

  4. Make healthy choices is just part of the equation to have a partial solution to obesity and related issues.
    People should also be aware that to improve their health they also need more exercise and this factor can make a great difference.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: