• Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 21,921 other followers

  • Instagram

    Today, the United States spends $218 billion a year growing, processing, transporting, and disposing of food that is never eaten. Fortunately, there are a number of ways to reduce food waste.Click here to read IFT Achievement Awardee Edward Hirschberg’s solution for how we can address food loss due to poor transportation and storage. Link available in bio or copy/paste this link: http://bit.ly/IFTFoodWaste Today, we are celebrating women in science for International Women's Day! The International Women's Day is a global day celebrating the social, economic, cultural and political achievements of women. These particular five women have been at the forefront of some of today’s most complex and controversial scientific issues including genetic engineering and lab-grown meat. In addition to highlighting their work, these interviews explore the influence of gender in food and science. Click link in bio #IWD2017 #internationalwomensday #womeninstem #foodscience http://hubs.ly/H06wKB60 Roughly one third of the food produced in the world for human consumption every year — approximately 1.3 billion tons — gets lost or wasted. Fruits and vegetables have the highest wastage rates of any food. What can we do with spilled, wilted, blemished produce? Click here to read IFT Achievement Awardee Edward Hirschberg’s solution for bringing life back to the "ugly" lettuce. Link available in bio or copy and paste the following to view solution: http://bit.ly/IFTFoodWaste #Repost @hanna_instruments ・・・
The Hanna Texas team had a great time at @iftfoodscience's Lunch & Learn at @nasajohnson on 2/23. Hanna USA proudly sponsored this event featuring a talk by @nasa scientist Dr. Shannon Walker, a tour of the food lab facility, and behind-the-scenes tour of Mission Control! Thank you again to IFT and NASA for an incredible event.

Soy and Cognitive Function: Latest Results

The effect of soyfoods on cognition has been a topic of some controversy. Because soybeans contain isoflavones, which are phytoestrogens, some researchers have theorized that they could prevent cognitive decline that occurs with aging as estrogen is believed to do. However, the results from a Hawaiian population study published in the year 2000 linked soy consumption with greater risk of cognitive impairment (White et al., 2000).

A number of studies since then have challenged the findings from Hawaii. Recently, an expert panel organized by the North American Menopause Society concluded that clinical research suggests soy could favorably impact cognition in women younger than 65, with little effect in older women (2011). The panel also emphasized the need for further research, and especially for larger and longer studies.

That call has been answered with a study by investigators from Stanford University and the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine (Henderson et al., 2012). In this three-year study, 350 healthy postmenopausal women received either 25 g of soy protein or 25 g of milk protein daily. The soy protein provided 91 mg of isoflavones, the amount found in 3–4 servings of traditional soyfoods. At the end of the study, women who had consumed soy protein showed more improvement in tests of visual memory—the ability to recall pictures. Generally, however, there were no differences between the groups in terms of global cognitive function.

The study is important because of its size and duration. These findings refute concerns that soyfoods could be harmful for cognitive function, although they don’t support the theory that they are protective. However, the study did show heart-health benefits for younger postmenopausal women in that their progression of subclinical atherosclerosis, an indicator of stroke and heart disease risk, was markedly reduced in response to soy intake (Hodis et al., 2011).

It is not clear to me that additional research is justified unless there is reason to believe that a different soy product than the one used in the study in question (isolated soy protein) would have a different effect. And I don’t think that is the case. Having said that, the study in question did find soy improved visual memory and that equol-producers (a bacterially-derived metabolite of the soy isoflavone daidzein) are perhaps more likely to benefit from isoflavones than non-producers. These two issues may be worthy of investigation.

Mark MessinaMark Messina
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health
Loma Linda University
Executive Director, Soy Nutrition Institute



Henderson, V.W., St. John, J.A., Hodis, H.N., et al., 2012. Long-term soy isoflavone supplementation and cognition in women: A randomized, controlled trial. Neurology 78: 1841-8.

Hodis, H.N., Mack, W.J., Kono, N., et al., 2011. Isoflavone soy protein supplementation and atherosclerosis progression in healthy postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 42: 3168-75.

North American Menopause Society, 2011. The role of soy isoflavones in menopausal health. Menopause 18: 732-53.

White, L.R., Petrovitch, H., Ross, G.W., et al., 2000. Brain aging and midlife tofu consumption. J Am Coll Nutr 19: 242-55.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: