• Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 21,921 other followers

  • Instagram

    Today, the United States spends $218 billion a year growing, processing, transporting, and disposing of food that is never eaten. Fortunately, there are a number of ways to reduce food waste.Click here to read IFT Achievement Awardee Edward Hirschberg’s solution for how we can address food loss due to poor transportation and storage. Link available in bio or copy/paste this link: http://bit.ly/IFTFoodWaste Today, we are celebrating women in science for International Women's Day! The International Women's Day is a global day celebrating the social, economic, cultural and political achievements of women. These particular five women have been at the forefront of some of today’s most complex and controversial scientific issues including genetic engineering and lab-grown meat. In addition to highlighting their work, these interviews explore the influence of gender in food and science. Click link in bio #IWD2017 #internationalwomensday #womeninstem #foodscience http://hubs.ly/H06wKB60 Roughly one third of the food produced in the world for human consumption every year — approximately 1.3 billion tons — gets lost or wasted. Fruits and vegetables have the highest wastage rates of any food. What can we do with spilled, wilted, blemished produce? Click here to read IFT Achievement Awardee Edward Hirschberg’s solution for bringing life back to the "ugly" lettuce. Link available in bio or copy and paste the following to view solution: http://bit.ly/IFTFoodWaste #Repost @hanna_instruments ・・・
The Hanna Texas team had a great time at @iftfoodscience's Lunch & Learn at @nasajohnson on 2/23. Hanna USA proudly sponsored this event featuring a talk by @nasa scientist Dr. Shannon Walker, a tour of the food lab facility, and behind-the-scenes tour of Mission Control! Thank you again to IFT and NASA for an incredible event.

Calorie Labeling: Coming to a Restaurant, Grocery Store, and Theater Near You

The long-awaited final regulations for calorie labeling were released on Dec. 1, 2014. These regulations come 4+ years after the law requiring them passed as part of the Affordable Care Act. And, the regulatory verdict from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is clear: Calories will be everywhere. Nearly all chain food establishments that sell “restaurant-type food” and have 20 or more sites nationally will have to post calories on menus. Despite early signals that some food establishments might be exempt, the final regulations state that fast-food restaurants, full-service restaurants, cafeterias, grocery stores, movie theaters, bakeries, convenience stores, vending machine operators, and yes, bowling alleys must comply. Schools are pretty much the only entities that aren’t included. The regulations give establishments until December 2015 to post calories; vending machine operators have until December 2016.

The regulations apply to “restaurant-type food,” defined as “foods that are usually eaten on the premises, while walking away, or soon after arriving at another location.” A food establishment doesn’t even need a menu; as long as they sell these foods, they have to create calories labels for their products. The regulations contrast “restaurant-type food” with food not under the purview of the law—“foods that are grocery-type items that consumers often store for use at a later time or customarily further prepare.” These include, for example, birthday cakes, loaves of bread, and nuts in bins as well as items that aren’t self-service and sold by weight (e.g., deli salads) and those that require further processing (e.g., deli meats). For “restaurant-type food,” only temporary items are exempted, meaning those that are on menus for less than 60 days during a year.

The new regulations also don’t cover packaged foods/drinks. As directed by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, these items already have Nutrition Facts panel on them. They will not have to change their package labels as the result of this law (unrelated to the calorie labeling law, the Nutrition Facts panel is in the process of a makeover).

How might dietary choices change as a result of these regulations?
Several municipalities, including New York City, Philadelphia, and Seattle, implemented calorie labeling years ago. Their experiences have provided preliminary insight into whether calorie labeling might work to change what people buy and eat. As a colleague and I recently discussed in a commentary, evaluations of calorie labeling show mixed results. One large study of Starbucks purchases found a 6% reduction in calories after calorie labeling in New York City (compared to Starbucks in Boston and Philadelphia, prior to calorie labeling).

Two studies in New York City either found no effect from calorie labeling or a small effect in a few restaurant chains. A recent review examined all scientific studies on calorie labeling and concluded that labeling works best when calorie counts are put into context, such as providing both calorie labels on items and statements on menus describing recommended total daily calorie requirements. This is good news for the federal labeling law. The new regulations will require food establishments to include such a statement on menus.

Overall, prior research suggests that changes in consumer choices from labeling may be small, if they change at all. This isn’t particularly surprising. Consumers are bombarded with advertising, aromas, and decisions when they walk into a food establishment. The calorie labels will be prominent, displayed similarly to the price, but other decisions may be more important, such as the taste and price of items. Some consumers might respond readily to the labels, and others might not even notice them.

But, any changes, even small ones, could have large effects across the U.S. population. Perhaps most important are responses of food establishments and their suppliers. Establishments might reformulate their products to keep the calorie numbers down. We’re already seeing some evidence for this in Seattle, Wash., after their labeling law. Perhaps in anticipation of calorie labels, or just as a response to market demands for healthier restaurant food, new menu items being introduced in restaurants are lower calorie than previous items. These changes are critical because they do not require consumers to make active choices; foods are lower calorie by default.

The widespread posting of calories also may bring greater transparency to the concept of calories, helping consumers to better estimate the calories in foods, a task that has been difficult for most of us. After four and a half years waiting for the regulations, the final verdict on calorie labeling may be right around the corner.

Jason Block, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor and Associate Director
Obesity Prevention Program
Department of Population Medicine
Harvard Medical School
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute

Email: jblock1@partners.org
Twitter: @jasonpblock
Website and blog: www.weighinginblog.org

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: