• Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 21,921 other followers

  • Instagram

    Today, the United States spends $218 billion a year growing, processing, transporting, and disposing of food that is never eaten. Fortunately, there are a number of ways to reduce food waste.Click here to read IFT Achievement Awardee Edward Hirschberg’s solution for how we can address food loss due to poor transportation and storage. Link available in bio or copy/paste this link: http://bit.ly/IFTFoodWaste Today, we are celebrating women in science for International Women's Day! The International Women's Day is a global day celebrating the social, economic, cultural and political achievements of women. These particular five women have been at the forefront of some of today’s most complex and controversial scientific issues including genetic engineering and lab-grown meat. In addition to highlighting their work, these interviews explore the influence of gender in food and science. Click link in bio #IWD2017 #internationalwomensday #womeninstem #foodscience http://hubs.ly/H06wKB60 Roughly one third of the food produced in the world for human consumption every year — approximately 1.3 billion tons — gets lost or wasted. Fruits and vegetables have the highest wastage rates of any food. What can we do with spilled, wilted, blemished produce? Click here to read IFT Achievement Awardee Edward Hirschberg’s solution for bringing life back to the "ugly" lettuce. Link available in bio or copy and paste the following to view solution: http://bit.ly/IFTFoodWaste #Repost @hanna_instruments ・・・
The Hanna Texas team had a great time at @iftfoodscience's Lunch & Learn at @nasajohnson on 2/23. Hanna USA proudly sponsored this event featuring a talk by @nasa scientist Dr. Shannon Walker, a tour of the food lab facility, and behind-the-scenes tour of Mission Control! Thank you again to IFT and NASA for an incredible event.

Single Food Agency: Theory vs. Reality

The Obama Administration’s recent budget proposal for FY 2016 endorsed the concept of establishing a single federal food safety agency—reviving discussion on what has been a long-standing issue. This initiative has generated many of the same talking points that have surrounded this topic for decades, including everyone’s favorite reference to the absurdity of a system in which the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) maintains processing oversight of a cheese pizza until pepperoni is added, at which point the oversight shifts to the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture’s Food Safety & Inspection Service (USDA FSIS).

There is near universal agreement that no one would design such a system if they were working off a proverbial clean sheet of paper. While this is undoubtedly correct, it forces us to juxtapose this theoretical point against the 100+ years of oversight, policy, and paperwork generated by the FDA, FSIS, and its predecessor agencies, not to mention other relevant players such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC), and countless other state, local, and private parties. This history raises enormous practical and political barriers to change. We have a status quo maintained by a dizzying array of interests, both public and private, scattered through various government, departments, agencies, congressional committees, trade associations, labor unions, etc. 

Given the fact that the inherent logic of consolidating food safety into a single organization has never under prior circumstances been enough to overcome such obstacles, it is difficult to envision just how such change could be accomplished in today’s fractious political environment. But even if this high hurdle could be cleared, we would suggest that such change, in and of itself, would do little or nothing to alter the inherent structural differences in the American food safety system. More specifically, those who suggest that the establishment of a single food agency would promptly resolve the ancient pepperoni vs. cheese pizza dilemma are simply misguided.

The unavoidable reality is that for over a century the U.S. Congress has mandated that first meat, and then subsequently poultry and certain egg products, are to be subject to an inspection system that requires carcass-by-carcass examination of all animals to be slaughtered, continuous inspection of the products into which they are further processed, and the application of a federal mark of inspection to all such products affirming their safety and wholesomeness. No such inspection requirements are mandated for the remainder of the food supply which, at the federal level, remains under the FDA’s jurisdiction.

On a conceptual and scientific level, the agencies are moving in similar directions as the FDA’s on-going efforts to implement the requirements of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) are largely compatible with FSIS’ long-standing adoption of mandatory Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system requirements. However, to date, the FSIS’ adoption of HACCP has, to the disappointment of some, done little or nothing to lessen its basic commitment to the carcass-by-carcass and continuous inspection models. And the unusual intensity of the opposition mounted in response to FSIS’ recent, relatively modest efforts to alter its carcass-by-carcass inspection requirements for poultry is indicative of the overall resilience of the status quo.

Conversely, as the FDA continues to implement the FSMA with a budget that, at least in relative terms, is exceedingly modest, it can only look at the level of human resources available to the FSIS with a great deal of envy. Given the number of domestic food processing facilities under the FDA’s jurisdiction, not to mention the volume of imported products, the numbers (both in dollars and people) just do not add up.

Despite its theoretical merit, the establishment of a single federal food safety agency within the foreseeable future seems like a long shot at best. But if and when it does occur, such a change will not alter the fact that we have chosen to establish two fundamentally different food safety systems within this country. What it might do, however, is more clearly bring into focus the question of whether or not we should continue to do so.

Bob Hibbert
Partner
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Tony Pavel
Partner
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: